• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Russian labor law has seen a contentious issue arise in employment contracts, with the government's efforts to strengthen entrepreneurship and business growth affecting their enforceability.

In Russia, employment contracts, known as 'ogranichenie konkurentsii,' have been in implemented for many years, mostly favored by international companies. These agreements restrict an employee's ability to work for a rival company, possess or disclose confidential information, or engage in similar business activities after leaving the company. However, these agreements often raised questions regarding their enforceability and effectiveness.

The Russian government has implemented significant modifications aimed at protecting start business in Russia and fair competition. In 2019, the government passed a law allowing employees to sign non-compete agreements. However, these agreements were also limited to particular areas and required strict requirements for enforcement. The law stipulates that the limits on an employee's activities must be justifiable in terms of time and scope and cannot last more than two years after the employee leaves the company.

Furthermore, the law introduced stricter requirements for non-compete agreements. Employers must provide clear information to employees before signing such agreements, including the terms, duration, and extent. The employer must also obtain verbal consent from the employee confirming that they understand the terms of the contract. If an employer fails to comply with these standards, the employee may void the agreement.

Russian courts have taken a relatively pragmatic stance on upholding non-compete agreements. Courts generally consider whether the restrictions imposed on an employee are justifiable and if they serve the justifiable needs of the employer. If the restrictions are deemed unreasonable or overly broad, the court may refuse to enforce them.

The trend in international companies operating in Russia is to adopt a more judicious approach to employment contracts. These companies avoid binding employees to restrictive covenants as much as possible or choose more unique arrangements. This shift has sparked debate in the commercial community about whether employment contracts add worth in Russia or merely create superfluous risks.

In recent years, there has been an increase in litigations between employers and former employees over the effectiveness of restrictive covenants. This rise in litigation has led some Russian law experts to argue that employment contracts may be more of a barrier to Russian companies' success than a protective solution.

It remains unclear whether Russia's anti-monopoly regulations will ultimately abolish employment contracts altogether. However, with the current law requiring employers to adhere to harsher standards, it's evident that employees possess significant leverage to challenge restrictive covenants in court. As Russian employment law evolves, businesses and employees will need to navigate the intricacies of employment contracts carefully to avoid disputes and litigation.